Read Dark Rivers of the Heart by Dean Koontz Online

dark-rivers-of-the-heart

Do you dare step through the red door? Spencer Grant had no idea what drew him to the bar with the red door. He thought he would just sit down, have a slow beer or two, and talk to a stranger. He couldn't know that it would lead to a narrow escape from a bungalow targeted by a SWAT team. Or that it would leave him a wanted man. Now he is on the run from mysterious and ruthDo you dare step through the red door? Spencer Grant had no idea what drew him to the bar with the red door. He thought he would just sit down, have a slow beer or two, and talk to a stranger. He couldn't know that it would lead to a narrow escape from a bungalow targeted by a SWAT team. Or that it would leave him a wanted man. Now he is on the run from mysterious and ruthless men. He is in love with a woman he knows next to nothing about. And he is hiding from a past he can't fully remember. On his trail is a shadowy security agency that answers to no one--including the U.S. government--and a man who considers himself a compassionate Angel of Death. But worst of all, Spencer Grant is on a collision course with inner demons he thought he'd buried years ago--inner demons that could destroy him if his enemies don't first....

Title : Dark Rivers of the Heart
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 9780553582895
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 582 Pages
Status : Available For Download
Last checked : 21 Minutes ago!

Dark Rivers of the Heart Reviews

  • Daniella
    2018-12-09 16:01

    This book is made of fail.I tried three separate times to finish reading Dark Rivers, but unfortunately, it simply couldn't hold my interest. At first, it seemed to have all the ear-marks of a fun, fast-paced, suspensful read. A man with a dark secret; a mysterious woman on the run from a secret, amoral government agency; a sociopathic serial killer cum secret government agent hot on their trail--all in all, this book could have been good. Hell, with its incorporation of high technology and conspiracy theorist undertones, it could have even been great.Dark Rivers, however, failed to meet even my lowest expectations. Between Koontz' stunted and oft-awkward prose combined with (or perhaps stemming from) poor word choice, and his long-winded, drawn-out descriptions of events, reading this book became a chore after the first fifty or so pages. Not only did it feel at times like he was simply writing to fill up space, drawing out each event or description as much as possible rather than reworking the material to create a longer, more intensive plotline, his insistence on dragging out the final revelation regarding the protagonist's "dark secret" was quite frankly irritating. I found it especially irritating because Koontz employed liberal use of pseudo-stylistic flashbacks in order to relate this terrible secret to the reader, yet he eventually revealed said secret within the normal course of the narrative, making the final, protracted flashback sequences somewhat superfluous and unnecessary.I could go on, but I think those few points are sufficient to explain my loathing of this book.So, in conclusion, Dark Rivers isn't worth the paper it's printed on, or the time it takes to read it. I would recommend it only to avid Koontz fans who will read anything he churns out, regardless of whether it's actually good, and also to aspiring authors who wish to learn what NOT to do, because this book stands as a prime example of why "churners" do a disservice to the art of writing.

  • Karen San Diego
    2018-11-18 23:04

    Definitely my most favorite book - Koontz or not.Critics of this book (I have just read some of the reviews) are quite understandable.I am a Filipino,but I am also a patronizer of the American politics.Many may say I do not know much,for I don't live under the American government,but they must also remember that this novel is not based on a true story.It's fiction,and everything is real and possible in a work of fiction.They can't criticize a fiction novel using reality as a basis,it's going to be more of an opinion than a neutral review.Dark Rivers of the Heart is one of the greatest piece ever written by Dean Koontz.The first part of the novel opens with the story of a young man Spencer Grant who is tormented by the past,which he keeps escaping.After meeting a mysterious young lady Valerie Keene,and gets enchanted by her at first sight,he becomes consumed by the need to "find a life".When Keene does not appear the next night,he comes to her house only to get caught up in an electrifying assault by mysterious armed men;and eventually feels the need to find her and help her,whoever she is.In this story,the virtue of freedom,the grip of faith and the power of love - with a lesson that will make you understand the meaning of past and its connection with fate - Koontz has made another flawless masterpiece that will surely make your heart race and fall in love at the same time. Dark Rivers of the Heart is a package by the way - techno-thriller,suspense,comedy,romance and drama.You will never regret reading.Definitely his best chase novel.

  • Dustin Crazy little brown owl
    2018-11-19 17:09

    On the road that I have taken,one day, walking, I awaken,amazed to see where I have come,where I'm going, where I'm from. -The Book of Counted SorrowsI didn't really like this when I first read it 2006. I tried to re-read it with the Koontzland - Dean Koontz group in 2011, when it was chosen as a group read but I just couldn't get into it so I put it aside. In 2017, I successfully completed Dark Rivers of the Heart with the Koontzland - Dean Koontz Group. I must admit that this is among the most solid and formidable novels by Dean Koontz. I still don't consider it one of my personal favorites, but I appreciate the work. In the Koontz Universe, everything is connected & I typically pick up on connections carried between Dean Koontz novels. I can't think of another Dean Koontz novel that is filled with more references & similarities than Dark Rivers - there are shadows of other sagas including Dean's most recent novel THE SILENT CORNER. There are so many novels that connect to Dark Rivers that I shouldn't even attempt to list them, but here are a few: The Silent Corner, Hideaway, The Door to December, Velocity, The Key to Midnight, The Face, The Mask, Dragon Tears, Relentless etc.Favorite Passages: Wednesday night, he had stepped through an invisible doorway that separated his lifelong reality from another place. In this new reality, Valerie was his destiny. Once found, she would be a magic lens that would forever alter his vision. All that was mysterious would become clear, but things long known and understood would become mysterious once more._______His heart had been pounding with a strange jubilation, as though he desperately wanted to encounter something paranormal, even if it proved hostile, rather than return to a life without wonder._______On clear nights, the Rocky Mountain sky was deeper than eternity, deeper even than the mind could imagine, and starlight sparkled in the icicles.

  • Matt Barker
    2018-11-22 20:57

    Another great book by Dean Koontz. He is quickly becoming one of my favorite authors. The books are great, the humor is welcome, and they usually keep me reading until late into the night.Publisher's SummarySpencer Grant had no idea what drew him to the bar with the red door. He thought he would just sit down, have a slow beer or two, and talk to a stranger. He couldn't know that it would lead to a narrow escape from a bungalow targeted by a SWAT team. Or that it would leave him a wanted man.Now he is on the run from mysterious and ruthless men. He is in love with a woman he knows next to nothing about. And he is hiding from a past he can't fully remember. On his trail is a shadowy security agency that answers to no one, including the U.S. government, and a man who considers himself a compassionate Angel of Death. But worst of all, Spencer Grant is on a collision course with inner demons he thought he'd buried years ago - inner demons that could destroy him if his enemies don't first.

  • Johnny
    2018-12-06 21:51

    This book has been a longtime favorite. It's more of a straightforward thriller, similar to Koontz’s recent high-concept novels, but far more thoroughly worked out. There’s a level of depth that signifies an old-style Koontz. I’ve read this novel several times, but during this second reading of the original English text I noticed that nothing he writes is mere filling; everything matters.The novel chapters switch between the pro- and antagonist, but without a change in verb tense as he does in later novels; the use of the present tense, however, is still used for small flashbacks.Koontz really puts us off on the wrong foot with these characters. What we at first would consider good guys suddenly commit criminal (and even violent) acts right after their introduction.Spencer Grant, the main character, is introduced after he has already met his female counterpart, which is different from Koontz’s usual tactics of letting these characters’ first meeting be witnessed by the reader. When Grant goes back to the cocktail lounge where the woman works, she appears to have vanished. All Grant’s next moves are in function of finding her again. Thanks to his computer hacking skills – though he’s certainly far more than just a nerd, as soon becomes obvious – he locates her address and finds himself inside her home. The good guy turned creepy stalker soon drops back in his original role by what happens next, however. And of course Koontz connaisseurs should never doubt the righteousness of a character accompanied by a loveable canine.The other bit of misdirection concerns Roy Miro, the main villain of the piece, who is introduced helping out a woman with car trouble. He changes her tire, being gentlemanly all the way, only to follow the same path as Spencer Grant afterwards: he looks up her address, finds her at home and kills her and her husband. In contrast to Grant, Miro stays evil and his actions will turn him into a memorable Koontz villain. For some reason I’ve always pictured him as a grown up Roy Borden of “The Voice of the Night” fame.I already mentioned the dog in this piece. Rocky is more than just a companion to the main character; he’s really a full-grown character of his own and even though he can’t talk, he’s still capable of participating in dialogues. But apart from many other dogs in Koontz books, Rocky always remains “just a dog”. There’s no gimmick to elevate him to a higher level of dogginess; no increased intelligence like Einstein of “Watchers”, no inner dialogue as with the dog in “Dragon Tears”, yet his presence really adds something to the novel besides using him as a plot device.The second part of the book finally brings the enigmatic and elusive Valerie Keene to the foreground. At this time, the spy games have really kicked off and the story becomes like a Jason Bourne movie. The most memorable thing about this novel, is the use of lots of high-tech spy stuff, using computers in all kinds of ways not only to collect data but to physically locate people as well. For the finale, Koontz takes it one step further and introduces a popular conspiracy theorist’s weapon, which might jump the shark a bit (or perhaps better in this case, nuke the fridge) depending on your own level of gullibility.To prevent the novel from being that straightforward thriller I mentioned, Koontz adds his signature psychological element concerning Spencer Grant’s past, in the form of the previously mentioned flashbacks and by the appearance of a ghost of his childhood – his father who turns out to be a serial killer who also murdered Spencer’s mother – which always seemed a bit out of place compared to the rest of the novel, not to mention too convenient for the villains.

  • wally
    2018-11-14 21:04

    heh heh! there's a blurb, one of many, from the orlando sentinel: "as it appears, george orwell was ten years late, and it is left to dean koontz to add the finishing touches to an orwellian future that is here and now. one of his best novels."i chuckle because of so many takes i've read from others who flam-beau koontz for his vision...ha ha ha ha! i mean, i've often wondered if when our elected newbies get to where they're going if they're not taken into a room, w/o any windows or doors....work w/me...and they're introduced to our handlers, shape-changers who in turn change them, into something acceptable.great story, some sci-fi elements, big-chase elements, powers-beyond-our-control elements...a great dog, rocky, who is built for speed and enjoys it as well. big black chrysler limousines, helicopters.spencer and valerie, right, they meet by chance. valerie is more than a waitress in a cocktail lounge. and spencer has a past that plays a part. "he had good reason not to dwell on the past." (an idea that comes back a time or two in may of koontz's stories, like his latest novella/novel, 2010...what's it call?....shoot me) mormons and guys in suits, hardware in armpits. nice, too, the idea that is also present in other koontz stories, a kind of network of resistance.i know i've read this one at least twcie, probably three times. well worth one read.

  • Patrick Kiernan
    2018-12-06 21:00

    A good story but far too long this was the second group read for Koontzland

  • Rebecca McNutt
    2018-12-08 23:55

    Pretty good book, Dean Koontz usually writes very interesting novels. :)

  • Brett
    2018-11-27 00:11

    Here is more junk from DeanThis book makes me feel uncleanIt's a bloated waste of timeIt's a bother to make this rhyme--the Book of Counted SorrowsWe may as well start with that title, Dark Rivers of the Heart. Melodrama much? You can practically hear the 1980s saxophone solo reverberating through the title. It’s a harbinger of things to come. The story opens with our protagonist, Spencer, stalking a woman. She was the waitress at the bar the previously night, who chatted with him. Spencer has returned the following evening, and is distressed to find out she’s not at work. So distressed, in fact, he decides he should drive to her house and check on her. He creeps around and doesn’t see her. When she doesn’t answer the door, he breaks in and starts taking a look at her stuff and trying to learn about her. Though Koontz is at pains to try to frame this as normal and good behavior, I guess I have to point out that it’s not. It is, in fact, extremely scary and an awful thing to do. Spencer has great difficulty understanding appropriate boundaries and there is no question his behavior is criminal. He deserves to go to prison right away. Spencer is your basic arch-Koontzian hero type. It’s the only type that Koontz writes. He is a Very Good Man with a Dark Secret. The woman that Spencer is doing his best to terrorize at the beginning of the novel is Ellie. She is also the stock Koontz type of love interest: faultless, hyper-competent (able, for instance, to commandeer foreign defense satellites from a laptop computer in a car in 1994, because…hacking), also with a mysterious and painful past. We also get the obligatory Koontz dog, which is contractually required to include in each story.Spencer and Ellie get wrapped up in a plot that involves a clandestine government agency the employs a sadistic bureaucrat willing to torture and kill in the name of a misplaced, vaguely liberal ideology. Might as well spend a minute on our villains here as well. Roy, our main bad guy, likes to kill people in the name of empathy. For instance, if someone is in a wheelchair, he may shoot them because he feels so sad for them. I’m sure this is supposed to be a skewering take on PC liberal values, though it is, uh, dumb as hell. There is also a beautiful woman whose main quality is that she is ambitious and enjoys self-pleasure, and [obligatory spoiler warning] a surprise last minute bad guy whose “art” involves seeing beauty in the pain of others. The spoiler warning is truly unnecessary, since 100% of readers of the book will see the twist a mile away.The novel is simultaneously rote and extraordinarily long-winded. It’s over 550 pages when it easily could have been 350. In the middle sections, I frequently experienced déjà vu, reading the endless chase sequences again and again. Now is the part of the review where I really slide in pedantism and quote parts of the book at you, for you experience the majesty yourself:Page 83, [our hero Spenser is talking to a restaurant owner/landlord who is a Mysterious Asian with Deep Insights]: “After a pause, with his eyes still hidden by the patterns of reflected color that glimmered in his eyeglasses, he continued: ‘The larger a government, the more likely it is to be riddle with such covert organizations—some small but some not. We have a very big government, Mr. Grant.’‘Yes, but—‘“Direct and indirect taxes require the average citizen to work from January until the middle of July to pay for that government. Then working men and women begin to labor for themselves.”Ok, first of all, this statistic is complete bullshit. Secondly, look how much Koontz is awkwardly trying to shoehorn his email forward political ideas into the story. It completely kills any momentum in terms of character or plot. This is both bad politics and bad writing. Koontz does a very similar thing on page 309, where he interrupts his (previously alluded to) story about commandeering a spy satellite to interject some garbage about EPA: “The EPA cooperated so successfully with the Department of Justice that a citizen who even inadvertently contaminated protected wetlands was at risk of spending more time in prison than would a doped-up gangsta dude who killed a 7-Eleven clerk, a pregnant mother, two nuns, and a kitten while he was stealing forty dollars and a Mars bar.” Ho-ho! Koontz really hitting the bad writing jackpot with being stupid, unfunny, and killing story momentum all at once. These are a couple of examples but the book is littered with this nonsense. Usually these are dressed up, like the EPA comment, as “funny” side commentaries. They’re the kinds of things your uninformed grandpa might say. Maybe it doesn’t bother you, but it certainly is a distraction for me. Authors that want to engage with social issues are great—but you have a responsibility to make some effort to accurately describe reality.At the conclusion of the book, Spenser and Ellie have evaded capture from an all-powerful, high-tech quasi-governmental unit and are on the run. Rather than trying to find somewhere to hide out, Spenser convinces Ellie to stop by the old farm where he grew up and had a traumatic experience as child. This moment, he decides for some apparent reason, is when he wants to go back and try to remember the events of the past, which he conveniently has amnesia-ed out of his brain. I’m tired of writing this review and I’m sure you’re tired of reading it, if you’ve gotten this far. There’s no reason, plot-wise, that he should want to stop off at the old place, but Koontz needs to tidy up the end of the book by having him confront all of his old demons in both literal and metaphorical senses. The place is chosen for symbolic value, even though it makes no sense in a variety of ways. No moral ambiguity is allowed to exist—the bad guys are very bad and our good guy is completely good (at this point, we are expected to have forgotten about his breaking and entering and stalking from the first part of the book.). Justice is supposedly served and everybody lives happily ever after. We also get a whole other side-plot forced into the last part of the book about some kind of network of resistance fighters, but you don’t want to hear about it and I don’t want to write about it. It is just as bad as the rest of it. I’ve read and reviewed a lot of Koontz in my time, often being very hard on him. However, the last few books of his I read prior to this, I took it a little easier and tried to be more forgiving. I don’t have that forgiveness in me this time around. This book is an offense. It’s as bad as his worst work dating back to his early novels. It’s called Dark Rivers of the Heart, but it makes me think Koontz has dark rivers in his brain.

  • Siobhan
    2018-12-08 22:49

    I’m a massive Koontz fan, I love pretty much every book I have read by him, yet I am of the firm belief that his older work is much better than his more recent work. I admit that the Odd Thomas series is my favourite, but collectively his older work scores higher ratings than his more recent work – for me, that is.So, that means you’re going to hear a number of the same comments about this one as with his other work.As always, Koontz creates a collection of great characters (yep, even those with mysterious pasts) and throws them into a truly gripping story. I confess that this one started slower than some of his other books, but once the ball is rolling it does not stop. A faced paced suspenseful read, it has everything that Koontz has to offer: his usual charms of pulling at our emotions, leaving us second guessing, questions arising only to be answered at the right moments… basically the old school Koontz package. Overall, another great old school Koontz. Whilst not my favourite by the author it is a great way to remind me of what he is truly capable of.

  • Maria
    2018-11-30 21:12

    Dean Koontz has done it again. I have a love/hate relationship with most of his books. He reaches out and grabs you by the throat and drags you through the white-knuckle adventure and doesn't let you go until the last page. His writing is so much more spell-binding than other people in his genre. The "hate" part is that I can't get anything done when I'm engrossed in his books. My business goes to pot, my house doesn't get cleaned. And after I escape, wrung-out and exhausted, I look around and am overwhelmed with all the stuff I DIDN'T get done while I was under his spell.This book is no exception. There are a few things that might have been left out. Maybe a few minor details, but mostly it was perfection and I was left being paranoid of the power the government has over our lives, and it wouldn't take much of a stretch for this novel to be a true story.

  • Adam Burton
    2018-12-11 21:05

    Ugh. I tried, really tried to like this. A number of friends, whom I consider readers of taste, recommended Koontz. I listened to an audiobook of this. Bleah. I mean, the plot was interesting enough to keep me until the end of the story, but the writing was god-awful. The style kept changing between a stereotypical "taut thriller" no-frills Hemingwayesque voice and this bizarre, baroque, almost delirious pseudo-poetry. Maybe that was a conscious technique (I hope so for his sake), but I found it jarring and off-putting. Perhaps Koontz has others that are better, but I'm not inclined to seek them out.

  • Shaun
    2018-11-26 16:58

    GREAT READ! This one comes highly recommended. also check out From the Corner of His Eye Large Printand Life Expectancy After this sample you will be hooked and will surely want more. This Koontz addiction is like crack.

  • Janille N G
    2018-11-19 16:13

    8/18/2017Someone literally left this book on a table by my desk at work and said ANYONE could take it! I was like, Ummm, okay, that book's mine now...because I am, naturally, a book hoarder (and really, no one else at my work wanted it because it just sat on that table all day, which is inexplicable to me -- who wouldn't want a FREE BOOK?!?!). So, now it's sitting on my desk, just waiting to be read...at some point...when I dig myself out of the pile of books I have to be read at home.

  • Tricia Douglas
    2018-11-20 00:11

    It's been a while since I've read a Dean Koontz novel. I don't know how I could have missed this one! Spencer Grant has a mysterious past that the reader only slowly learns about. He is in love with a woman he knows little about and is being chased by people who want him dead. This book is fast-paced and exciting. Every chapter adds more depth to the story and builds on the character of Spencer Grant and his violent past. I think I need to go back and reread more of Koontz's novels. Excellent writer!

  • Jordan Lombard
    2018-11-20 23:09

    Could not put this down. It had me on the edge of my seat all the way through. I also appreciated that the ending was realistic, and that not everything was tied up in a neat little bow.

  • Tina
    2018-12-01 18:06

    2,5 *

  • Julie Powell
    2018-11-26 19:04

    This story is meant to be fiction and yet the more time that passes, the more real this chilling account of the world is, not only believable, but also fact...now in 2017.Corruption is rife, laws are beneficial for those in charge and power has twisted the hearts of those who have it.It was a long book and I was surprised by the numerous typos, however, the characters were great, and much of the dialogue between Spencer and Ellie was brilliant and funny (as I expect from this author), and Rocky's personality was both charming and sad. The villains were perfectly awful; just as they should. So, together with the suspenseful plot and psychological explorations, this made for a compelling read.Hope - yes, let's hope.Highly recommended.

  • Maciek
    2018-12-01 21:05

    Dark Rivers of the Heart (1994)There's really not much that could be said about "Dark Rivers" that hasn't been said. It doesn't really break any new background; if you've read Koontz before you won't be surprised by anything.The protagonist, Spencer Grant (who of course has a haunted past) travels with his dog Rocky (who has good reasons not to dwell on the past too) in search of a woman, Valerie, whom he fell in love with...after chatting with her for 20 minutes in a bar. Spencer arrives at the Red Door, the place where he met her, but she's not there so he goes to break into her house. Of course Valerie has mysterious past too, because at her place some kind of SWAT team surprises Spencer and he has to go on the run.The first biggest problem with "Dark Rivers" is that it's very dated. Koontz spends a lot of time describing the wonderful new technology - Spencer is astonished when Valerie's computer has 10 gigabytes of disk space - but for the modern reader it's ultimately boring. Page after page is spent on descriptions of laptops, hacking, computer access all cutting edge circa 1993.The second biggest problem is Koontz's concern with the Asset Forfeiture laws. He devotes a whole sub-plot which takes quite a lot of space to talk how the US Government can steal property from an individual with absolute impunity. All of this horror (exagerated or not) was made obsolete in 2000 by the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act. Besides, with the privacy of American citizens being threatened by the Patriot Act...Asset Forfeiture doesn't look that big of a deal.The third biggest problem, which might be the biggest of them all, is the helplessly bad ending which Koontz yet again pulled straight out from his butt. I've read much about how this book was "Dark" and the ending "bleak", bbut it turned out not to be the case. Koontz did write some fun chase scenes here but totally screwed the final confrontation, making it anticlimatic, lazy and idiotic."Dark Rivers" is quite long, but for most it's fast paced and enjoyable, if you can turn off your brain and pretend not to notice the bad dialogue and usual Koontz cliches.

  • Bob
    2018-11-30 18:03

    Dark Rivers of the Heart is a monumental test of human endurance. It gets so boring by the halfway point that any sane reader would drink liquid cyanide before bringing themselves to finish this book. At first it seems interesting. Agency and high tech stuff, what could go wrong? Everything. I wouldn't be surprised if the editor face rolled the keyboard somewhere near page 562. The combination of this book’s terrible quality and it being a required reading, with deadlines, creates a nightmare for the English student. It causes one to reconsider their faith in God, as how could He have let this tragedy happen to you? Throughout the book, the protagonist talks to his dog as a way to clear his thoughts. It is obvious that he considers the pet to be his intellectual superior. The same seems to apply to the author. He had enough creative ideas for perhaps 75 pages, but decided that he wanted to make a 600 page book, and so resorted to filling the remaining 525 pages with both human and canine diarrhea. The characters are one-dimensional robots that have no reason to act the way they do, although some invisible deity forces their actions in order to make a story. It simply doesn't make sense to go up against a powerful and evil organisation just because you want to help a random girl you talked to one night at a bar. You might say that since it’s a techno thriller, the reader should be more lenient towards subhuman characters. That could be so, if the technology was any good. Unfortunately, the technology presented in the book is deserving of aleph-two facepalms. Nobody’s impressed with 5 KB of memory, Koontz, so please stop bragging about it in the book. Although such things seem minor at the beginning of the book, when Koontz invests most of his 75 pages of creative material, they become the sole focus of the book when the book progresses and the author runs out of plot. The junk food I ate while procrastinating reading this book filled dark rivers in my heart. I expect Koontz to pay for my heart surgery 60 years down the road.

  • Ally Atherton
    2018-12-01 00:03

    One man walks into a bar with a red door, looking for the woman who could save his life. The same man is walking around with a scar and the weight of the world on his shoulders. Spencer Grant is trying desperately to forget his past but also to remember the one thing that is stopping him from moving on. The day he walks through the red door is the same day he finds himself being hunted by men in helicopters and on a perilous journey for his life through Las Vegas and the over stretched arms of the desert.One man, a dog and a mysterious woman are escaping, they just don't know where to or where it will all end. But somebody wants them dead.This is the first Dean Koontz book that I have read and it is one of those books that I started a couple of years ago ( I think) and never quite finished. At 728 pages it is a hell of a book-end and becomes the longest book of the year for me.I'm not really into thrillers but for this challenge I want to read a few of them as well as other genres. As far as thrillers go this is a pretty descent read and although it is a long book, it did ( more or less) keep my interest all the way. The main two characters as well as the peripheral characters are absorbingly real and the characters and plot are revealed bit by bit and not all at once. In fact the whole plot is clever and suspenseful. At times it is as gruesome as Stephen King and it also contained parts that would make those of a more prudish nature blush !Although I generally enjoyed this book I did think the ending was a little bit unrealistic in parts and also a tad disjointed but there was probably no other way to conclude the story.It is quite well known that Dean Koontz writes each page excessively slowly and only moves on once he is happy with it and such attention to detail shows in this book. Although I'm still not sold on thrillers I would like to read more from this author who has escaped my radar for so long.7.5/10

  • Michael Bohli
    2018-12-09 18:19

    Bockmist.Das habe ich nun davon, dass ich mich daran gemacht habe, alle Bücher die seit Jahren im Regal verstauben nun doch zu lesen. Vor ca. 15 Jahren verfiel ich den Geschichten von Stephen King und lernte darum auch Dean Koontz kennen. Auch er gilt als Meister der Spannung und oft unheimlichen Geschichten. "Dunkle Flüsse des Herzens" soll ein super Thriller sein, voller Nervenkitzel und Aufregung. Und vielleicht hätte ich dies im Alter von 15 auch so beurteilt. Jahre und viele Überlegungen später empfand ich diesen Roman aber nur noch als eines: Scheisse.Die Geschichte ist langweilig, voller Logiklöcher, hanebüchen und einfach nur veraltet schlecht. Sicherlich war ein solcher Technik-Thriller in den 90er-Jahren noch eher futuristisch anmutend, heute gähnt man bei diesen Verschwörungstheorien und Machenschaften nur noch müde.Koontz schafft es zudem auch nie, sprachlich tolle Sätze zu fabrizieren. Seine Beschreibungen sind billig, die Charaktere platt und voller Klischees - und vieles driftet gar in pupertäre Fantasien ab. Mir doch egal, dass alle Frauen grosse Brüste habe und ihre Blusen sich über die Nippel spannen. Und nein lieber Autor, die Hauptperson davon reden zu lassen, dass er aus moralischen Gründen nie eine Lüge erzählt wenn sein Hund dabei ist, das ist kein toller Kniff.Erstaunlich auch, wie viele Seiten Dean Koontz benötigt um seine Geschichte konstant in leeren Kreisen ziehen zu lassen - nur um am Ende alles in eine möchtegern verwobene Struktur einzubetten die überhaupt keine Rolle spielt. Klar, meine Ansprüche an Bücher sind stark gewachsen. Aber auch für Gelegenheitsleser muss dieser Schund doch wie eine Beleidigung anmuten?

  • John
    2018-11-17 16:54

    Having read the first 150 pages, I'm officially done with this novel. I usually have good luck with Koontz, but this is one of the exceptions. Reasons why I just can't bring myself to finish it are as follows:1.) The story is so shrouded in mystery that it's hard to have a good understanding of what's happening and why. I'm sure it eventually all becomes clear, but I find it hard to get into a story when I don't even know the motivation of the main character.2.) The cheese factor. Dean Koontz is not known for writing techno thrillers. There is a reason for this. When the spy elements of the story start coming into play, I just can't take them seriously. The secret base hidden under the restaurant reminds me of Undercover Brother, not James Bond.3.) The cute factor. I get so sick of the main character's damn dog. Page after page is devoted to pointlessly describing the dog's lovable antics. I know Koontz is a great lover of dogs in real life, but this is just too much. In Watchers, the dog was central to the story, so it was important to focus on him. In this one, the dog seems to be used only for cute comedic relief, like a chirping monkey in a bad pirate movie.4.) The outdated technology. Actually, I don't mind books with antiquated technology, but Koontz isn't good at making the technological aspects of the story interesting. He simply fawns over the hardware. A dial-up modem? Wow! And a 10 gigabyte hard drive?! No way!5.) The writing style. This is the most boringly written Koontz novel that I've ever read. Utterly devoid of any real tension or excitement.

  • Спеченега
    2018-12-02 19:11

    https://chitanka.info/book/2728-tymni... Ако с "Непознати" (1986г) Кунц става истински писател, то с "Тъмните Реки на Сърцето" (1994г) той става улегнал писател. Става наистина зрял, макар и без да напуска попрището на булевардната литература.В "Тъмните Реки на Сърцето" освен стандартното вече за него безкрайно напрежение и милиони описателни детайли, започват да се появяват определени дикенсоновски (в нашата част на света биха били "вазовски" но всеки стъпва върху своята си класика) нюанси тук-таме, малки скептични но доволно проницателни коментарчета за света които се промъкват в пролуките на екшън фабулата.Фабулата е, както си му е реда, баналност на квадрат--мъж с белег на лицето и мрачно минало се опитва да спаси мистериозна жена в която е влюбен, докато ги преследва лоша тайна държавна агенция.Е, но ние не очакваме от тази жанър фабулата да е нещо различно--това не е нито космическа фантастика, нито постмодернизъм, примерно.Макар… именно в тази книга се случва нещо прелюбопитно от структурна гледна точка. Докато главния герой (Спенсър), неговото куче, и Валери, мистериозната жена с която се вземат (естествено) бягат от лошите, главния лош (Рой)—убиец психопат работещ за тайната държавна агенция—също намира своята половинка в живота (Ив).Психопатът Рой смята себе си за чувствителна и състрадателна личност изпълняващ своя дълг не само към цивилизацията, но и към вселената. И не дай боже да види примерно угрижено семейство което обсъжда как не им достигат парите—веднага ще ги издебне и застреля, и умилен до сълзи от своята добродетелност, ще им подреди още топлите трупове в трогателна картина на любов. Той ги е освободил от напрежението на живота им, ах колко е готин. А ако е убил жена която има някакви очарователни черти—примерно перфектни уши или ръце—ще си вземе нещо за спомен и ще си го носи в кутийка да му се радва докато не се разложи, но никога няма да вземе всичко--все-пак е готин, и мисли и за другите.После включи в контакта електрическата резачка, която бе донесъл от гаража, и освободи Джиневра от дясната й ръка. Внимателно я сложи в правоъгълна пластмасова кутия, върху друга мека кърпа, и затвори капака.Искаше да вземе и лявата ръка, но почувства, че би било твърде егоистично да притежава и двете. Трябваше да остави едната ръка на тялото, така че полицаите, съдебният лекар и погребалният агент да видят, че Джиневра е притежавала най-красивите ръце на света.Но ето че един прекрасен ден, докато се опитва да намери информация която да му помогне да хване и убие Спенсър и Валери, Рой е доведен от досаден колега на място където…среща своята половинка.Ив също има специфичен подход към живота. Тя се преструва че просто работи като програмист за специалните служби, но самата тя също не е против да екзекутира някой ако мисли че това ще и донесе пари или друга облага. В живота и няма място за мъже и за непланирана страст--обаче като вижда Рой всичко се променя. Рой и Ив отиват на вечеря, след която той решава да покаже на нея своята истинска, чувствителна, състрадателна същност, и в паркинга екзекутира женена двойка, за да им спести мъките в живота.— Добър вечер — рече той и бръкна в кобура под сакото си.Мъжът и жената го погледнаха и едновременно отговориха:— Добър вечер.В гласовете им прозвуча озадаченост, сякаш се опитваха да си спомнят откъде го познават.— Усещам болката ви — продължи Рой, извади пистолета си и застреля мъжа в главата.Вторият куршум улучи жената в гърлото, Но не я уби. Тя падна на земята и започна да се гърчи конвулсивно.Рой мина покрай мъртвеца в инвалидната количка.— Съжалявам — каза той на жената и отново стреля в нея.Новият заглушител на беретата работеше добре. Февруарският вятър стенеше в листата на палмите и никой от трите изстрела не се чу на повече от десет крачки.Рой се обърна към Ив Жаме.Тя беше втрещена.Той се запита дали не се е държал твърде импулсивно като за първа среща.Ив е покъртена, да, но не и ужасена, покъртена е в положителен смисъл, но не съвсем както Рой би искал. Тя е поразена не то дълбочината на състраданието му, а от непредвидимата власт която Рой има.— Те отиваха на вечеря — развълнувано добави тя и започна да кара бързо и безразсъдно. — Обикновена вечеря. Нищо специално. И ти ги уби! Ей така. Очисти ги, не за да вземеш нещо от тях, нито дори защото те ядосаха. Направи го за мен. Единствено за мен. За да ми покажеш какъв си всъщност.— Да, за теб. Но не само за теб, Ив. Не разбираш ли? Сложих край на две несъвършени съществувания и тласнах света сантиметър по-близо до съвършенството. И в същото време освободих онези двамата от бремето на този жесток живот и този несъвършен свят, където нищо не е такова, каквото са се надявали. Дадох нещо на света. И на онези нещастни хора. И никой не загуби.— Ти си като вятъра — задъхана каза тя. — Като фантастична буря, ураган, торнадо. Само че няма кой да предупреди за появата ти. Ти притежаваш силата на бурята. Ти си природна стихия. Изникваш внезапно и безпричинно.Впоследствие връзката им става физическа—по техния изчанчен начин, разбира се. Секс за тях е Рой да седи облечен и да гледа докато Ив цяла нощ се подлага на мастурбационни ритуали с нарастваща сложност.И тук Кунц показва че е цар на (булевардната )проза. Очевидно се е обзаложил със себе си че ще може да опише мръснишка сцена без нито веднъж да не спомене нещо мръснишко—а само чрез загатвания и метафори да накара читателя да си представи какво се случва.Невероятното й тяло сякаш бе изваяно от скулптор и се зареждаше с енергия от неспирното, ритмично свиване и отпускане на мускулите, гърчене, мятане и тласкане. След като години наред бе експериментирала различни начини на самозадоволяване, Ив се радваше на гъвкавост, равняваща се на движенията на носител на златен олимпийски медал по гимнастика и карнавален акробат, съчетана с издръжливостта на впряг от северни кучета. Нямаше съмнение, че по време на усамотените си сеанси в леглото тя бе усъвършенствала всеки мускул на тялото си./.../През третия час батериите на някои от любимите й играчки се изтощиха, скоростите на други се повредиха и Ив отново се отдаде на сръчността на собствените си ръце, които приличаха на живи същества. Ръцете й се движеха с такава трескава страст, че не можеха да се занимават само с едно от съкровищата на тялото й. Непрекъснато се плъзгаха по пищните извивки, масажираха и галеха различни прелести. Приличаха на двама умиращи от глад гости на разкошен коктейл, подготвен да отпразнува предстоящата битка между доброто и злото и разполагаха само с няколко ценни секунди, за да се натъпчат, преди всички да бъдат унищожени от взрива на слънцето.Но слънцето, разбира се, не експлодира и най-сетне, макар и постепенно, онези несравними ръце забавиха ритъма и спряха. Ив се насити на тялото си.Тоест в този роман се появяват две влюбени двойки—положителния герой и героиня, и психопат и псхихопатка които искат да ги убият, а впоследствие ако може да станат господари на света. Това добавя измерение с което фабулата излиза от баналното и става по-игрива, и в някакъв смисъл—да, постмодерна, както един игрив мрачен титан като Иън Банкс или Мартин Еймис или дори Том Пинчън би подходил към темата, макар с много по-възвишени езикови еквилебристики, естествено.Книгата завършва двусмислено—всеки поема по своя път и не знаем как приключват нещата с нито една от тези двойки.Но едно е ясно—с тази книга Дийн Кунц успява да прекрачи в нов период на своето творчество—запазвайки трилър майсторството което постига от 1986г нататък—но сега вече в зрял вариант—с нюанси и модификации които липсваха преди.

  • Mary
    2018-11-24 00:05

    This is certainly not a Koontz book that I would recommend to anyone...even die hard Koontz fans. I have heard that Koontz is a horror writer but had never seen evidence of that. Well, now I have. I am not a reader of horror so cannot say whether for that genre it is well written or not. I will say that two very long parts of this book made me literally sick and I had to switch to skimming. That may imply that he is a genius at horror. :-) I wish he wasn't. Anyway, in between the twisted and depraved parts there were slow slow (skimming again) car type chases...Koontz is good at these chase things but the length and unnecessary detail seemed self indulgent. The thought also crossed my mind that he got a payback from Ford because of the endless praise of the indestructible ford explorer. :-) I don't really believe that but...I will say that the characters were real and developed. The villains were truly terrible psychopaths and evil, evil, evil! The "good guys" were good and the side stories were interesting. Of all the evil in this book, the government was the most evil of all. He definitely made the case for that. There was also a lot of technical computer and satellite talk (also seemed excessive and took away from the story...(skim again). Unfortunately much of that info was outdated so that even I knew what he was talking about!

  • Jesse
    2018-11-22 22:05

    I read this book several times as a teenager and it remains one of my favorite Koontz books. Tons of adventure, suspense, unexpected plot twists and two protagonists I really liked...and some antagonists who were entertainingly malicious.The romance angle seems a bit unrealistic by today's standards, but it is admittedly realistic when it comes to the loneliness that so many people feel, going through their everyday lives, searching for someone to share it all with. That's a recurring theme in a lot of Dean Koontz's books, especially those written in the 1980s. And at the time, it struck a deep chord with me, too.It's interesting to think that some of the high technology mentioned in this story must have seemed like science fiction when the book first came out...though it is mundane and commonplace today, and in many cases, even dated.This was an entertaining read and one that I go back to, again and again. Out of all of Dean Koontz's work, this is one of the best.

  • Melissa
    2018-12-15 21:54

    I have not read a Dean Koontz book for years and I loved it! The story is slowly revealed bringing past present and future into play all to the end of the book with a climatic ending, and unlike many books of this nature, it is not all together predictable in what will happen. The characters are all very interesting and intriguing. I enjoyed many of the tid bits of information that were related to true events added to the story and the info at the end of the book really added to the ending, making me think even more about what our society is coming to and how this has all pretty much been in motion and predicted for centuries. Though I love conclusive endings answering all my questions I enjoyed the open ending of the main characters, good and bad, still going on in their lives, it seemed a very realistic ending, rather than the good guy always winning. Well done!

  • Raesaun
    2018-11-27 20:18

    I think the movement of the story was pretty cool. Though I do feel bad for the past that Spencer had. Just sad.The good thing is that it all gets a little better in the end.Koontz is a great writer, but after reading a few books, it gets a bit boring that he has the whole "its-almost-the-same-as-my-last-story-but-with-a-few-changes-in-character-and-situation-maybe-a-pinch-of-spirituality-for-fun-and-maybe-a-change-in-city-or-state" thing he's got going on. But otherwise, he's awesome. Like super.PS: If you haven't read it, it can get a bit traumatizing toward the part where valerie and Spencer head out to colorado, and the "acts" taken place there. You have been warned!!

  • Greathornedowl
    2018-11-14 23:51

    This book is a poorly written stalker's fantasy. The characters are week and the main message seems to be if you stalk a girl she and are a weird brain damaged conspiracy freak, she'll fall in love with you. I almost didn't finish reading this book, but then I just wanted to see if there was something to it. I don't know how this book got sold to a publisher. The characters are little more than stick figures.

  • Jo Ann
    2018-12-11 17:11

    Besides a compelling plot and believable and sympathetic characters, this novel has a deeper meaning. It is a type of cautionary tale of a government gone awry, and fascists enabled by technology to control those they have promised to serve. When this was written in 1994 the Branch Davidian fiasco and the massacre at Ruby Ridge had occurred. I was starting to realize that the government was not my friend, something that Mr. Koontz knew and expressed so vividly.